Toy Story Costumes - Try Halloween Costumes From The Supporting Cast

Toy Story costumes have been ultra popular for years, and it would be very arduous to come up with a movie that inspired more Halloween dress ideas than the animated film Toy Story. Buzz Lightyear, Woody, Jessie, and all of the other toys make double perfect Halloween costumes that it nearly seems being if they were haggard for that very whole idea.

A Different Look at Toy Story Costumes

Toy Story costumes may be top on your index for Halloween clothing ideas this eternity, especially since it ' s so easy to find a Evaluator Woody, Cowgirl Jessie, or Buzz Lightyear getup. But wouldn ' t be be more rip-roaring to express more of your individuality and go with a less well - known toy from the blockbuster movies?

Of course, Toy Story costumes don ' t need to be limited to the three most well known characters. These are some lesser known players that would make excellent Toy Story costumes:

Bo Beep

As her name implies, Bo Peep is a toy that is modeled after Little Bo Peep. Bo Peep is also Woody? s love interest in the movie, so the two Toy Story costumes work great for couples! All it would take to dress up as Bo Peep from Toy Story is a cute shepherdess outfit? you can probably find what you need at your local vintage or thrift store.

Hamm

For many fans of the movie Toy Story, Hamm really stole the show. Hamm is a piggy bank, with a coin slot in his back and a cork in his stomach. Toy Story costumes modeled after Hamm are not difficult to make, especially if you are able to purchase a pig costume. Of course, pre - made Hamm Toy Story costumes are also available.

Mr. Potato Head

Mr. Potato Head is a potato - shaped toy with large, colorful body parts that detach. His character is sarcastic and outspoken, and as far as Toy Story costumes go, he makes a great one! A Mr. Potato Head Toy Story costume is a great chance to get creative? imagine all the possibilities with those interchangeable parts!

Girls also have a great opportunity to get creative with Mrs. Potato Head. She ' s almost the same as Mr. Potato Head but with more feminine plastic parts like eyelashes, skirts and high heel shoes. Think of how well a Mr. and Mrs. Potato Head costume would work for couples going to a costume party together!

Because Sarge Says So

You ' ll remember Sarge as the leader of the toy soldiers made of green plastic. He ' s still one of the more popular characters and creating his signature all green uniform is as simple as finding an Army surplus store and some green face makeup.

Whether you go with Bo Peep, Mr. Potato Head, Sarge or Hamm, you ' re sure to have a hot and unique Toy Story costume. Why would you want to be like everyone else and blend in with the crowd as Buzz Lightyear, Woody or Jessie when you could be the life of the party as your own creation?

Toy Story 3 and the Fear of the Empty Nest

A sensitive of mine has been spending numberless of his sessions speaking about how briskly his 3 girls are growing up. He is contemporary thinking of how time is flying and pdq they will be in college. His oldest will be turning 8 in May. He is in his early forties, just celebrated his 10th conjugal anniversary, and his youngest child has not consistent started school. Why would someone with equivalent young children be fretting about the departure of their children when they temple ' t comparable today school? He had mentioned seeing " Toy Story " with his oldest daughter. He uttered he enjoyed it very much and start up it very poignant. I asked him to write me something about it.

What follows is his writing:

I proverb Toy Story 3 with my two kids last summer. It was one of the few movies that well caused my hardened heart to tremble and a cloyed soul to stir. I couldnt look back the last time I openly wept, and I dont conceive I ever did that in front of my kids. The movie was terrific ( seeing Toy Story 1 and 2 were ) but it was especially the last scene that was so heart - tugging. This was the scene that depicted Andy, the main character, about to leave for college but making one last stop, to play with his treasured toys one final time and then, to give them away.

http: / / www. youtube. com / watch? v=grSg8cd8v - Q&feature=related

What about this scene provoked such a reaction? For me, there was a deep, poignant sense of loss that was detailed in this scene, and it came not just from a loss of the toys. It was a loss of something much larger, and Andy himself seemed to realize it. Watching that particular scene, those of us who were now adults realized how brief and fleeting that period of our lives lasted. And those who of us who were now adults with children realized how little time we had left with our kids. They too, would be leaving for college, before we knew it.

Leaving the movie theater, I looked at my older daughter, Emily, now 8 years old.

How fast did the last 10 years of my life go by? It went by like a flash of lightning. And so the next ten years she was going to be leaving for college within that same flash of lighting. I reached for her hand and she grabbed it as we walked to our car. Her other hand clutched the same teddy bear that she had been holding on to for the past five years. We still had some time.

John ' s marriage is tentative at best. He is not a great communicator and is a workaholic. He spends little time away from his computer - running a multitude of ventures at once. He is extremely bright, and very well organized. He seems to be the main caretaker of his children, deals with all child related emergencies, as well as parties and play dates. He works a great deal from home, and it seems the children have become his assumed responsibility most of the time.

His wife is very bright, and seems to be the one in charge of discipline. She is a " yeller ", and most of the time it is directed at the oldest child, who is shy and somewhat withdrawn. The middle child is comical, outgoing and extremely precocious. The baby enjoys being adorable and is slightly rambunctious.

What I think John is really doing is rehearsing the empty nest syndrome. As many people realize, children are a tremendous distraction in a marriage. During the child rearing years, many couples forget why they were drawn to each other. Usually, this occurs closer to the time the children will be departing from the familial home.

Most people have to reinvent themselves as a couple - into a relationship that involves just the two of them. For some it is a rekindling of the relationship. For others, it is a not so gentle reminder that the children may have been the reason that the marriage was intact up until this point.

I think what John needs to do is fix it before it is not able to be fixed. Couples need to spend time alone, strengthening their relationship and not losing the focus on the initial bond that brought them together.

Make special time for the two of you. Although difficult, do whatever you can along the way to keep your love alive and be each others friend. Then the ultimate separation will not be so painful. The mark of a healthy child is to be able to leave the nest and make a life of their own. The mark of a healthy relationship is to still have a good one after the children have made lives of their own.

Kate

http: / / www. eastcoasttherapist. com

The Story Of Noah ' s Ark Just Doesn ' t Float

How do so alive with races of the human genus come from just eight people, supposedly of the duplicate pursuit? How do the blond, Nordic Caucasians, and the swart Aborigines in Australia emerge from the duplicate gene pool endow in Noah ' s small family, which were Mesopotamian Caucasians, or maybe shadowy Arabs? This remarkably doesn ' t make sense, especially in luminous of the Human Genome Project ( HGP ) which traces DNA origins of current humanity back to Africa.

When the wash ultimately receded, bearings did it all go? If it just rained 40 days and 40 nights nonstop, enough to cover the highest elevation peak, it would be Mt. Everest at 29, 017 feet hefty sea leveled in today ' s measurements. Do you know how much wash that is and how long it would part for it to recede to the being day coast goods? It would receipts centuries! Envisage a band of flood around the earth 5. 5 miles most the ocean level and that would be how much dilute the Bible wants people to believe flooded the earth. If all the existing oceans were 5. 5 miles subterranean, this would be more than twice the amount of water on earth already at that time. If that much fresh rain water were added to the salt water in existing oceans, it would greatly dilute the saline content of the water causing instant death to the majority of marine life, which apparently did not happen. The sheer weight of all that water would likely slow earth ' s rotation speed and imbalance vital weather patterns, circulation of ocean currents and tidal patterns, and other natural rhythms. The most obvious question is where did all that water go?

Salt water covering the dry land would prevent flora and fauna from growing, so how could a Dove bring back an olive branch to Noah? Remember, the Romans sewed the fields of the Carthaginians so they couldn ' t grow food, so the same principle would apply all over the world. It would take years for any vegetation to appear in saline soils and the PH balance would be off too; not to mention that most top soil would be long gone when the water receded. If these conditions applied, chances were that Noah and his family could have been stuck on the Ark for several years, not a few months.

Then there are some basic design considerations that do not make much sense. For example, all the animal manure would have gathered in the bottom of the Ark and the fumes from all the waste would have been toxic to humans, even for several months. Where and how did they store enough fresh water for all the animals? Did they drink rain water? Where was all the food stored? Carnivores needed fresh meat, but there was no refrigeration, and herbivores needed many types of fresh green vegetation, besides grain, which would have putrefied, or dried out over time. Where were all the flowers for the honey bees?

The Deluge has been reported to have taken place in the third millennium before the birth of Jesus Christ, most likely between 2, 500 BCE and 2, 300 BCE. According to the King James Version of the Bible, the Flood was 1, 656 years after Creation. The Ark was said to be made of " gopher " wood, or cypress, and was larger than the Titanic as described. Structural engineers say that no wooden vessel that large, supposedly assembled with non - metal joinery only, could ever hold together against the lateral ocean forces without strong steel plates and fasteners, which were not available in the Bronze Age ( 3, 500 - 1, 200 BCE ).

Despite this, the Ark would not have been large enough to hold two of each kind of terrestrial animal. There are over 30 million species of land creatures and taking two of each kind would take up more room than several large ships could accommodate. Two animals of every kind are insufficient to propagate a species because there would not be enough genetic diversity, and parents would have to breed with their offspring, and the offspring would have to interbreed among themselves. This would cause genetic mutations in many species.

If all the animals were able to disembark from the Ark resting on Mt. Ararat, then why doesn ' t the fossil record show animal bones emanating in a geographical pattern from Mt. Ararat at this time? It does not. How then did the panthers get to South America and the platypus and kangaroos arrive only in Australia without leaving traces along the path of their migration from that central point? Did they all just swim across the seas to the islands where they are found exclusively today? Did the pair of Gecko lizards show up in Hawaii without leaving a trace anywhere else in between? How about the polar bears and caribou? The patterns of species diversity found on the earth today, and in fossils, cannot be explained as emanating from a single point. Think about it. If the Ark landed on the top of Mt. Ararat, which is 16, 945 feet above sea level, most living things on the Ark would have frozen to death at that elevation in a matter of hours.

Clearly, anyone with any sense at all, and an IQ above their body temperature, has to recognize that there are serious flaws in this story and it cannot be taken as literal fact.

The Turtle Story

A classic book by Adele Faber and Elaine Mazlish, called How to Talk So Kids Will Listen & Listen So Kids Will Talk, contains a story that I have rewritten for my own purposes and recounted to virtually every client who enters my office. The book illustrates its points with cartoons, in a series of panels. The " turtle story " begins with a young skirt inflowing her father ' s office in grieving. " My turtle is drag! " doll wails. Her father turns from his trial and replies, " It ' s just a turtle. We ' ll get you a new one. " His daughter ' s requiem stay unabated. I identified juicy with that structure, for that ' s how my parents talked to me when I was young.

But turning the page offers a different synopsis, which I have amplified to drive the point home. Once also, the young nymph enters her father ' s office in tears and wails, " My turtle is dead! " But this time the father behaves differently. He sits down opposite his daughter, making eye contact, and says, " You miss your turtle. " " Yes! " she exclaims between sobs. " He was my friend. " " You sound sad, " the father observes. " I am, " she cries. " Suppose you tell me about it, " he says, and continues listening until the girl has finished everything she has to say.

Then, instead of offering a ready - made solution, the father asks, " What are we going to do about this? " She reflects for a moment and then inquires, " Can we bury him in the back yard? " " Of course we can, " her father says.

When I first read this story many years ago I wept, and the first several times I told it to clients I got a lump in my throat. I would love to have had someone talk to me that way when I was a child.

This little story contains all the basic principles for dealing with feelings, whether your own or someone else ' s. First, listen openly and with empathy. Communicate to the other person ( or to yourself ) that there is nothing in the world that you would rather be doing right now than listening to the expression of these feelings. It may be helpful to reflect back, " You seem angry ( or scared, or whatever ). " ( When overwhelmed by a situation, children may only be able to describe themselves as " upset. " You can assist them to discriminate among the basic emotions. )

Don ' t interrupt; don ' t analyze; don ' t criticize; don ' t propose solutions: just listen. ( If you ' re listening to yourself, get out your journal and just write out every word that the feelings inspire, without worrying about punctuation or grammar. ) Then, after the feelings have been completely expressed, indicate your solidarity by asking, " What do you think we should do about this? " ' Not " Here ' s what you should do, " or " What are you going to do? " but " What can we do? " Often the person who ' s upset - be it a child, a friend, or a partner - will already know what needs to be done. In other cases, you can help the person explore various options without ever declaring what you think to be the right choice ( no matter how sure you are that you have the answer ).

To be truly listened to when you are upset is a rare gift. Honor the occasion that permits you to offer it.